There are a lot of things the audiophile world does well. For decades, we presented the coolest new tech at the Consumer Electronics Show. More importantly, the audiophile hobby allows us to bring music into our lives in ways that is often on par with the live or in-studio experience. Where traditional audiophiles sometimes get a little stuck is with change. Too many in the audiophile community simply fight anything and everything new. The audiophile print magazines still can’t stop talking about vinyl when for the cost of one LP a month, an audiophile can have access to every recording basically ever made.
We called our publication Future Audiophile for a good reason: because selling oligarch-priced gear to septuagenarian audiophiles is not a sustainable business model. Things need to change for the better in terms of not just buyer demographics but in terms of technology, too. That change is coming. Chi-Fi is changing the value proposition for high-performance gear. Although there are no meaningful new ways to move air with speakers, the levels of refinement of the 75- to 100-year-old technologies that back today’s best audiophile speakers keep getting better and better. Today’s $2,000 floorstanding speakers are simply incredible. The finishes, the build quality, the improvements in drivers, crossovers, and cabinets are vastly improved even in the last say five years.
The world of audiophile amplifiers is having a sea change thanks to GaN technology – a new kind of semiconductor material, ideal for high speed MOSFET used as power device in switching amplifier (better known as Class-D amps). GaN (gallium nitride) amplifiers use very efficient circuits to create a switching amp (often wrongfully described by audiophiles as a “digital amp”)with a host of major improvements that are starting to shake up the way that the amplifier and audiophile world think of things. In Silicon Valley they use the word “disruptive,” which is meant as a purely positive concept just as the word “exploit” is in Hollywood when talking about ways to monetize your entertainment or media platform.
What Is Special About an Audiophile-grade GaN (Gallium Nitride) Amplifier?
- Traditional Class-D switching amps often are erroneously called “digital amps,” but that is a misnomer. The main difference between GaN based and traditional class-D amps is that these new amps operate at a far higher PWM frequency (800 kHz for GaN versus 400 kHz for traditional Class-D), of course needless to say that is basically impossible for humans to hear. The result with GaN amplifier designs (if the design is done correctly with the right components and state of the art layout), is a close-to-perfect square wave at the switching node (before the output filter) that eliminates all the artifacts, oscillations and other toxic effects from the output signal, hence almost performing as an ideal amp that our reviewers think sounds more like SET (single ended tubes) or lower-watt but higher-end Class-A amplifiers like my new Pass Labs XA-25 designed by Nelson Pass.
- GaN amps are very efficient in their designs, making them distinctive in an audiophile marketplace that is still refining age-old amplifier designs. Alberto Guerra of GaN pioneering audiophile company AGD Productions talks about how traditional amps utilize designs that include feet of cables when discrete GaN designs, much like a modern MacBook Pro with an M2 chip, have only millimeters of connections. Less is very much more in the world of amp designs.
- GaN amps create very little heat as compared to traditional linear amps. The best Class-A and SET amps also perform with close-to-colorless sound and nearly perfect square wave performance, but they waste tons of energy in heat. Heat is no good for electronics, be it your amp or the other sensitive electronics around it.
- GaN amps don’t need to be physically large to deliver big power, even into 2 ohms. This concept is going to start messing with audiophile stereotypes and norms, but stick with me for a second… You can build a high-power GaN amp that doesn’t need as much metal, which brings down the costs to manufacture the components. Additionally, with shipping costs going up, up, up, a lighter amp can ship to a dealer, distributor, or direct to the consumer with far less cost as well as a lower carbon footprint. The next generation of audiophiles value green technologies and GaN is just that.
- GaN Amps use less power from the wall than a traditional linear topologies such as a Class-AB. The idea that you need to actually see the impact of your audiophile amp on your power bill every month is very old-school thinking.
- When designed right, GaN amps can power even the most brutal impedance loads. Not every speaker today is a tough load to drive, but for those who have a taste for the planar or electrostatic designs, a GaN amp brings the sound that we love from tube or Class-A designs but with the internal fortitude to drive the hell out of a tough-to-drive speaker. That’s a best-of-both-worlds scenario.
In talking more with Alberto Guerra from AGD Productions about GaN versus other amp designs, he couldn’t emphasize enough the importance of the quality and design of the power supply in any high-performance audiophile amplifier. “The power supply is as important as the chosen amplifier technology,” he opined. One of the big differences beyond the switching frequency: more traditional non-GaN Class-D switching amps of the last 20 years often struggle sonically because of the use of less-than-robust power supplies. Class-D amps like the Pascal chip designs from the likes of Amped Technologies and Jeff Rowland Design Group are a good $5,000 and $30,000 examples of how Class-D amps can be top performers in the modern audiophile world. They clearly are packing serious power supplies. Most, but not all, of today’s GaN amps rock a beefy power supply too.
Who’s Using GaN Amplifier Technology Today?
- The new $5,000 reference Dimension DM80 speakers from Definitive Technology are a creative new use of GaN. The internal amplifiers are many times more powerful than previous models over the past 20 years at a lower build cost and with less heat.
- Peachtree Audio has a GaN 1 amp that packs 200 watts at a pretty affordable price.
- Orchard Audio’s Starkrimson GaN amps are sold direct. We reviewed a number of them including the Starkrimson Ultra 2.0 which is one of the best. We also reviewed the Orchard Audio Starkrimson Mono Block Amp which is smaller and less expensive.
- AGD Productions is one of the most expensive options in the GaN market today. We’ve reviewed their $5,700 AGD Productions Tempo di GaN power amp. and it was very good but much more expensive than other options on the makers today.
- Tube electronics company Atma-sphere now makes a GaN amp but they’ve failed to communicate with us on the topic as we’ve reached out to their founder a few times.
This isn’t a complete list of every GaN product but it shows the undercurrent of enthusiasm that is brewing in the audiophile world for this exciting new technology.
Some Audiophile Questions That GaN Raises…
- Can we accept that a small amp that isn’t the size of a Chevy V8 can make more power, drive the hardest loads, use less power, creates less heat, and costs less than traditional, linear amps?
- Could a future-minded, discrete amplifier technology possibly be better than a tried-and-tested technology from 100 years ago? (For example… tubes?) On the source-component front, many traditionalist only want to listen to vinyl, which is also a century-old technology with major technical flaws (very low dynamic range and lots of distortion) as compared with, say, a Compact Disc.
- Is using less electricity important in your audiophile system? Many of us never turn our amps off, thus thumbing our nose at the DWP. We use technologies that waste energy wildly in ways that aren’t found anywhere else in consumer electronics. Does ending practice appeal to the hobby?
I’ve heard GaN amplifiers and I am quite compelled by their sound as well as their potential. The FutureAudiophile.com staff is asking more and more about how they can get GaN into their review systems, which is fun to see and encouraging in terms of moving the hobby forward.
Have you heard any GaN technology? Are you inclined to look into it? Are you willing to put some age-old stereotypes from the audiophile hobby to rest in ways that we haven’t been able to with other technologies? Please comment below as we love to hear from you.
I believe Hypex Electronics Chief Engineer Bruno Putzeys has stated that the very best MOSFETs are compatible with his most recent designs and a lot less expensive than GaN. I believe Putzeys is considered to be the greatest designer working in Class D amplification. He is now turning his attention to power supply design. Though that field has been pretty thoroughly researched already?
Thanks for the heads up Trevor.
I am seeing GaN amps priced a lot less than AGD Productions but when you compare AGD to the stuff from CZ or here or anywhere in the high-end it is an amazing value.
Is GaN the only way to do Class-D? Nope. Look at the AMPED 2400 with the Pascal chip for $5,000 that Michael Zisserson just reviewed. How about the Class-A Pass Labs XA-25 that I haven’t finished reviewing at $5,200-ish. None are “cheap” but none are crazy priced either.
Steven Stone has an amp from Orchard Audio that is GaN for $2,300, I think. Something like that. That is his next components up for review.
Even Def Tech is using GaN in their new powered speakers.
As numerous “focus group” panels have shown, at least anecdotally, there are those that prefer a sound with some second harmonic distortion…those that prefer third harmonic….and those that prefer as close to zero as possible. The ultimate may be when one of the GAN guys provides an amp where the distortion profile can be dialed in by the owner….one day a “tubey” sound…the next day a distortion free sound.
Until then, people will continue to argue why their amp sounds the best…or why they own multiple amps so they can tweak the sound to their liking with just a simple amp change.
Do you have a link to these studies? I am curious
From my outlook – why would you spend $20,000 on a stereo preamp that has 0.000001% distortion and then feed it a distorted signal (like the 2nd degree harmonic distortion that comes from vinyl)? It makes no sense. The distortion keeps you from the music/master even if it sounds “warm”
Pass those links on if you can. 🙂
Why would you (or anyone) care about distortion, measured or otherwise, if it remains inaudible or unidentifiable?
For an industry considered to be science driven, maybe(?) hi-fi/high-end audio would be better served if more blind tests and reviews were conducted–the standard modus operandi within the scientific method.
I would not consider myself a Luddite, however sometimes “technology for the sake of technology” serves as little more than pseudo-intellectual masturbation.
For the record, we do blind tests all of the time here.
BTW: you can hear small amounts of distortion. That’s what you are paying for at the “Oligarch level” of high end. The Nth degree which costs a pretty penny.
That is encouraging to learn you do blind tests.
I look forward to reading more about the outcomes.
It could prove interesting, too, to learn the results of blind tests using various electronics driving low distortion loudspeakers–where 2nd through 5th harmonics are -40 dB (1% THD) or more below the signal (fundamental) throughout the spec’d frequency response.
I would be surprised (not unpleasantly) if listeners could identify the difference between electronics with distortion figures much below that of the speakers, or for that matter the recorded material.
Granted, controlling variables in such a test could present a few challenges. . .
Hi Ron,
The ear-brain system is extremely complex, and not as well understood as we’d like to think. I believe this is where it holds ground that yes, there are preferences to how a system sound, and no, there is no “right” way to do it. The right way for everyone is what works for them. Weather that involves 2nd order distortion or not. Its not my full cup of tea, but my friend’s system with 13 watt Audionote amps and Divore Fidelity Loudspeakers has provided many hours of enjoyment when visiting him!
I’d like to offer an alternative perspective: You can have a sonic signature that is warm, but still has resolution One that is sweet to the ears, but does not miss sharp dynamics… Even “neutral” is its own signature regardless of weather one can put a machinist’s level on a response line or not.
In short: When dealing with a sound like the AGD amps have, it provides the BENIFITS of what makes people love 2nd order distortion, without the detractions of 2nd order distortion such as roundness on the edges of the notes and apparent rolling-off of the top end.
This is my definition of “sophistication.” It all ties together neatly in that to my knowledge, a sophisticated sound was at MUCH higher price points as little as five years ago. While not cheap, these qualities are becoming available at prices that are beginning to become attainable for most. GaN such as AGD and good class-D such as Amped is making this possible – and THAT is what I am excited about!
Hi Michael. Again, your erudite comments draw my attention. As a baroque organist kid playing the huge Casavant Freres pipe organs in RI I had Hammond electronic organs at home for practice, so learned very early on how to mix harmonics (aka “drawbars”) to create the complex tonalities of the real thing. I often preferred mixing in a bit of that 2nd harmonic to fatten a fundamental. Otherwise pure fundamentals sound “naked” to most ears. But this feat is purely adding the tones an exact octave above the fundamental. (Adding the 4th harmonic creates “bite” that further enriches a lonely fundamental.). The problem of course is that the odd harmonics are in a sense enharmonic…and indeed add discordant “color” (think strings, brass, woody pianos).
These complex tones, replete with significant harmonics, are NOT generally helped by adding a cloned tonal envelope playing an octave (2nd harmonic) higher, as in some tube amps…or ss efforts purposely colored (yes, I’m winking at you, Nelson, Ralph, and maybe Alberto).
I recently read where audiophiles at shows like to listen to tube amps when playing music comprising a max of 4 instrument/vocal sources. Hmmm…otherwise it’s just TOO much?
Is that because when listening to a full orchestra or chorus one does NOT want to hear a bunch of miniature voices playing an octave higher for the added “fatness” of the 2nd harmonic?
Assuming flat frequency response from the best tube amps (not a given if driving low impedance loads!),
are the we in a space of diminishing returns as we add more “players” in the original musical mix?
In my pianistic world I prefer the harmonic-rich (lots of woody odd harmonics) sound of a New York Steinway over the clearer and more bell-like Hamburg brother, with its cleaner even-order harmonic envelope. But that means the Big Apple original hardly needs 2nd harmonic crutches, as there are enough already!
Tongue thoroughly ensconced in cheek, ErnieM
JAVA Hi-Fi is another brand to add to the list of GaN amp manufacturers. JAVA has two models of integrated amplifier and two models of power amplifier, all employing GaN FET technology. You van view the full range in the link below (Disclaimer: I am the founder and CEO of JAVA).
Email me as I would like to learn more about your company. I’ve never heard of you but I am glad you are on the GaN bandwagon. Looking forward to learning more.
Atma-Sphere now makes a GaN Class D to join its previously all tube lineup. The new amps are mono block 100wpc into 8Ohms and are fantastic. They have been voiced to sound like the Tube OTL’s in their lineup.
Thanks for pointing that out.
Somebody JUST hipped me to that fact. I don’t know those guys very well but we might want to test it.
Steven Stone is finishing up an Orchard Audio GaN amp for us now. We’ve got the AGD Productions one slated to run in the coming week.
We are all over the GaN issue 🙂
Yes
It is apparent that class D has now come out of the closet and is working to shed its “dry” reputation.
Aavik, Mola Mola, Bel Canto have higher end Class D products that rival anything out there.
The world of amp makers is going to Class D. I expect it to get even better in short order.
Other than a potential higher switching frequency, all the advantages attributed to GaN’s in this article are equally true for FET Class D amps. GaN amps are expensive but with little advantages over a well executed FET design.
Case(s) in point: Hypex’ NCOREx, Purifi’s Eigentakt. These FET designs offer many advantages over just about all of the available GaN designs: No varying frequency response with impedance; high damping factor, THD+N on the edge of what can be measured with only very few costly measurement devices, even at very low power levels.
Amps using these technologies can be widely found. As usual it’s all about execution. Merely as an example, the relative mainstream brand NAD has 2 poweramps based on Purifi in its line-up: the C298 and the considerable more expensive M23. Same output modules but the latter definitely a better performer than its less expensive sibling.
GaN for the sake of GaN doesn’t make a good amplifier, it’s the entire design around it that ultimately decides the end result.
I would have expected a more balanced view of Future Audiophile on the subject, I’m sorry to say…
WOW – you are hard to please.
Did you read all about GaN in the audiophile print magazines? (Hint, no you didn’t)…
We have NAD products in for review but how many more “mainstream” audiophile companies are using said chips? How many can get access (a huge issue)?
Haniwa Audio will be debuting its new GaN amp and 1 ohm single driver speakers with super subwoofer at Capital Audio Fest Nov 10-12 2023. https://www.capitalaudiofest.com. Come and listen!
How much?
What room?
I don’t know you guys. Can you email me your information?
I will be at the show Friday and part of Saturday
j
Orchard Audio will be debuting two new products at the 2024 Florida International Audio Expo. Once of them will be a new GaN monoblock amplifier. Please stop by for a listen.
I’ve heard Class D .I’ve heard A, AB, B, H, etc. They all sound different. I also love tubes. Last week I heard the new $90k Audio Research Amplifiers. I will likely never be able to afford a pair. But it provided drive, speed, punch and inner detail better than any amp I have ever heard. Not incrementally so. It was a huge, gorgeous 3 dimensional sound that I found Highly engaging. The true test was long complex symphonic work. Sometimes a challenge to follow. Not with the ARC amps. It pulled me in to hear the piece like never before. Solo acoustic guitar works were presented in 3D. You could see around the notes! You could hear the dynamic prowess of the guitarist in great detail.
I couldn’t ever “consume” enough of $90,000 amps. No matter what they do.
My take. Measurement is a great tool for engineers and designers. It is worthless for the consumer. People should be free from measurement bias to love what they love. If everything sounded the same, it would be a boring hobby. It’s not always about the music for audiophiles. For many, sonic characteristics are like wine or coffee. Each with it’s subtle notes and flavors. Each evoking different qualities of the recorded performance. There is no perfect wine. Each, within it’s budgetary constraint, offers value.
Thanks for the great comment!
I feel like an audiophile amp’s job is to not bring color or sound to the party. The recording is for that.
The amp’s job is to power the speakers effectively and GaN does this really well with no traditional “side effects” which makes it really compelling. The lack of heat and Class-A like performance at an affordable price are big draws to me
Jerry